star คาสิโน
Hellmuth vs. Negreanu: Time to Place Your Bets on High Stakes Duel II
By admin | | 0 Comments |

The long awaited Phil Hellmuth vs. Daniel Negreanu heads-up match is almost here! The poker world — at least from what I’ve been seeing on Facebook and Twitter — is all worked up in a frenzy. It’s the topic on everyone’s lips, and numerous industry podcasts can’t stop talking about the legendary matchup either. So yes, it is happening! Poker titans Phil Hellmuth and Daniel Negreanu will be locking horns in what’s sure to become an instant classic confrontation, on PokerGO’s High Stakes Duel II. The match is slated to begin on Tuesday, March 16th, at 8 pm Eastern/5 pm Pacific. Let’s get hyped, shall we… I, for one, am ready, and so are the two combatants, each of whom is coming off other recent heads-up matches. Hellmuth defeated Antonio Esfandiari in the (original) High Stakes Duel matchup, while Negreanu lost to Doug Polk in their 25,000-hand online poker battle. The rules of the High Stakes Duel II are as follows: Image credit: PokerGO.com Place Your Bets on StakeStars Ok, so now you’ve read the rules, you’ve seen the hype video, you’ve read the back and forth on Twitter, and you’ve heard the smack talk on every poker podcast out there. Now it’s time to pick a side! Based on Daniel having been in the lab for the past several months for his match with Doug Polk, while Phil is banking on what brought him to the dance as defending High Stakes Duel champ, conventional wisdom says that Negreanu is the solid betting favorite. However, that’s not the case at StakeStars. They’ve placed Hellmuth as the favorite in the match! So, if you’re on Team DNegs and looking for some great value on a wager, StakeStars is where you want to go to place your bet on the match. Negreanu recently joined Jeff Gross to discuss the match, and was informed of the StakeStars line… .@JeffGrossPoker & @RealKidPoker discuss the “crazy” line where https://t.co/me6o55jNh2 has @phil_hellmuth favored vs DNegs. If you like DNegs in this match you will not find a better line – check it out below! Direct link to bet: https://t.co/99DpIBuq1Nhttps://t.co/p7OR631u3l — StakeStars (@StakeStars) March 9, 2021 Well, as of this writing, that line is not sold out, and it is still available on StakeStars! As mentioned in the clip, the maximum bet is $500, which would currently net you a $725 profit on a Negreanu bet if he wins the match. A $500 bet on Hellmuth would net you a profit of $305 based on the -164 line as the favorite. Of course all of these calculations are correct as of publication time, but should the line move the payouts on all subsequently placed bets would as well. While $500 is the maximum allowed bet, you can of course wager any lower amount, so if you just want to put a fiver or a tenner on your favorite of the two Poker Hall of Famers and have a small sweat, you can place that bet, too, and have a rooting interest in the match. So, you in? Here’s where to go to get in on the action! We’re less than a week away form this battle of two absolute legends. It’s one of the most anticipated events in recent poker history, and StakeStars is giving you the opportunity to join the action. Once again, the opening bell rings for Round 1 of High Stakes Duel II at 8 pm Eastern / 5 pm Pacific next Tuesday on PokerGO. Don’t forget to grab the popcorn! The post Hellmuth vs. Negreanu: Time to Place Your Bets on High Stakes Duel II appeared first on Cardplayer Lifestyle Poker.
คาสิโน มือถือ คาสิโน ฝากถอนไม่มีขั้นต่ำ ไลน์ คาสิโน คาสิโน sagame350 คาสิโน ออนไลน์ ได้เงินจริงฟรีเครดิต
Addamo, Adams, and Bonomo Among Big Sunday Winners
By admin | | 0 Comments |

February 16 2021 Matthew Pitt Online poker tournaments are massive on Sundays and this fact along brings out the game’s best players. Michael Addamo, Timothy Adams, and Justin Bonomo are just three of those stellar names who managed to take down a Sunday major this weekend. Addamo Takes Down GGPoker Sunday 500 High Rollers $5,250 Michael Addamo enjoyed a super Sunday courtesy of triumphing in the Sunday 500 High Rollers $5,250, a tournament that attracted 113 of the world’s best players to the GGPoker virtual felt. Addamo’s first bullet didn’t go to plan and he crashed out in 76th place. He re-entered and put used his new stack to full effect. The likes of Kristen Bicknell, Matthias Eibinger, Elio Fox, Benjamin Rolle, and Anatoly Filatov busted inside the money places but before the star-studded final table. Austria’s “Filip1” was the final table’s first casualty. Their ninth-place exit awarding a $14,833 prize. Alex Foxen and David Yan then busted. Yan would go on to take down Sunday High Rollers Bounty King $3,150 for $49,300 later in the evening. The exits of Michael Zhang, Aleksei Barkov, Pascal Hartmann, and David Peters left Addamo heads-up against Wiktor Malinowski. Addamo rarely loses when he’s heads-up and that was the case again here. Addamo collected $131,187 for his victory while Malinowski banked $99,898 for his runner-up finish. Defeating Malinowski will go some way to making up for losing a massive $842,000 cash game pot last year. Sunday 500 High Rollers $5,250 Final Table Results PlacePlayerCountryPrize 1Michael AddamoCanada$131,187 2Wiktor MalinowskiMacau$99,898 3David PetersCanada$76,072 4Pascal HartmannAustria$57,928 5Aleksei BarkovRussia$44,112 6Michael ZhangBrazil$33,591 7David YanNew Zealand$25,579 8Alex FoxenCanada$19,478 9Flilip1Austria$14,833 ¥80 Million Gtd Asian Poker League (APL) Hits GGPoker Adams Takes Down High Rollers Blade Prime $2,625 Timothy Adams’ latest victory came in the High Rollers Blade Prime $2,625, an event that saw 80 players buy in. All but two of the players who navigated their way to the final table walked away with five-figures hauls. Fedor Holz and Andrii Novak being that duo. “LeoJose” fell in seventh and was joined on the rail first by Artur Martirosian, then by Urmo Velvelt, Rainer Kempe, and China’s Kevin Pu. This left Adams, on his one and only bullet, heads-up against Arsneii Malinov. Malinov fell at the final hurdle and scooped $36,565, which left Adams to add the $46,885 top prize to his GGPoker account. High Rollers Blade Prime $2,625 Final Table Results PlacePlayerCountryPrize 1Timothy AdamsCanada$46,885 2Arsenii MalinovRussia$36,565 3Kevin PuChina$28,516 4Rainer KempeGermany$22,239 5Urmo VelveltEstonia$17,344 6Artur MartirosianRussia$13,526 7LeoJoseBrazil$10,549 8Andrii NovakUkraine$8,227 9Fedor HolzAustria$6,416 Other GGPoker Highlights Shankar Pillai – first-place in the High Roller MILLION$ for $207,692Gabriel Schroeder – first-place in the GGMasters High Rollers $1,050 for $140,355MonkeyD93 – first-place in the Global MILLION$ for $112,712swedishdream – first-place in the Bounty Hunters HR Main Event $525 for $95,817*Sami Kelopuro – first-place in the High Rollers Sunday Blade Opener $5,250 for $57,374L1mpFold – first-place in the GGMasters $150 for $54,631David Yan – first-place in the Sunday High Rollers Bounty King $3,150 for $49,300*Joseph Cheong – first-place in the Sunday Bounty King $315 for $44,349*Ami Barer – first-place in the High Rollers Blade Mulligan $2,625 for $43,288Michael Zhang – first-place in the High Rollers Blade Opener $2,625 for $39,752Andras Nemeth – first-place in the High Rollers Blade Bounty King PLO $3,150 for $35,513*spera91 – first-place in the High Rollers Marathon $840 for $33,695Joao Caetano – first-place in the Sunday High Rollers Fifty Stack $500 for $31,657Boris Kolev – first-place in the Sunday Forty Stack $400 for $30,214Bruno Botteon – first-place in the Sunday high Rollers Bounty Special $840 for $29,113*Dante Fernandes – first-place in the Bounty Hunters Sunday Special $210 for $25,808*Babyccino – first-place in the Sunday Main Event $200 for $24,254Anton Wigg – first-place in the Sunday High Rollers Fast $525 for $13,780 *includes bounty payments Justin Bonomo Binks the partypoker High Roller Big Game Justin Bonomo Justin Bonomo, fresh from his recent Super MILLION$ victory, continued his impressive run of form by taking down the High Roller Big Game at partypoker. Bonomo came out on top of a 127-strong field in the $2,600 buy-in event to get his hands on $79,128. The final table was brimming with the world’s top poker talent, as you’d expect from such a prestigious tournament. Tomi Brouk busted in ninth and won $8,739, the tournament’s last four-figure prize. Ognyan Dimov, Roberto Romanello, and Pedro Garagnani were the next players to fall by the wayside. Niklas Astedt and Team partypoker’s Kristen Bicknell followed suit. Ukraine’s Pavlo Kolinkovskiy’s elimination in third-place, worth $34,935, left Bonomo and Ali Imsirovic heads-up for the title. Bonomo got the job done and secured the $79,128 top prize, leaving Imsirovic to bank $79,128. High Roller Big Game Final Table Results PlacePlayerCountryPrize 1Justin BonomoCanada$79,128 2Ali ImsirovicMexico$50,916 3Pavlo KolinkovskiyUkraine$34,935 4Kristen BicknellCanada$24,702 5Niklas AstedtSweden$18,330 6Pedro GaragnaniBrazil$14,667 7Roberto RomanelloUnited Kingdom$12,398 8Ognyan DimovBulgaria$10,539 9Tomi BroukFinland$8,739 Jamie O’Connor Takes Down Big Game Jamie O’Connor turned $530 into $41,417 by winning The Big Game. O’Connor was a guest on Leigh Wiltshire and Des Duffy’s APAT Show while he was grinding this event but chatting didn’t put him off the grind. O’Connor defeated Rui Da Silva heads-up to lock up the top prize and resign Da Silva to a $28,678 consolation prize. Two other players saw their bankrolls swell by five-figures. Fourth-place finisher Joel Nystedt scooped $13,158 with Joao Gaspar reeling in a $19,868 prize for his demise in third-place. The Big Game Final Table Results PlacePlayerCountryPrize 1Jamie O’ConnorUnited Kingdom$79,128 2Rui Da SilvaCroatia$28,678 3Joao GasparMalta$19,868 4Joel NystedtAustria$13,158 5Dwayne SluisNetherlands$9,177 6Fahredin MustafovBulgaria$7,273 7Justin OuimetteCanada$5,843 8Joakim AnderssonSweden$4,737 9Jamie NixonUnited Kingdom$3,844 Other Highlights From partypoker LivviG – first-place in the $320 The 300 for $19,962*BeastFromDaEast – first-place in the $109 Weekender for $17,563*Andreas Puntigam – first-place in the $55 Mini Big Game for $17,155freestylee – first-place in the $111 One Shot for $13,848*youngblood – first-place in the $215 Warrior for $13,450*EZfold55 – first-place in the $55 Gladiator for $12,138* *includes bounty payments partypoker MILLIONS Online Schedule Features MEGA High Roller and $5m GTD Main Event Peter Traply Nets Sunday Super Sonic Top Prize Peter Traply Peter “Belabasci” Traply triumphed in the PokerStars $215 Sunday Supersonic and banked a cool $20,378. That only tells part of the story, however, because the Sunday Supersonic is a hyper-turbo structured tournament meaning Traply’s victory only took one-hour 13-minutes for an hourly rate of $16,750, which is nice work if you can get it! Runner-up “mindreader007” and third-place finisher “acesdesigner” were the two other finalists whose $215 swelled to a five-figure score. Second-place weighed in at $14,591 with the third-place finisher collecting $10,448. $215 Sunday Supersonic Final Table Results PlacePlayerCountryPrize 1Peter “Belabasci” TraplyHungary$20,378 2mindreader007United Kingdom$14,591 3acesdesignerBrazil$10,448 4LilharmisFinland$7,481 5Michiel “utreg” BrummelhuisNetherlands$5,356 6Felipe “ultraviol3nt” OlivieriArgentina$3,835 Dutch Star Wins High Roller Sunday Supersonic “Daenarys T” from the Netherlands took down the $1,050 edition of the Sunday Supersonic and did so in a mere one hour and five-minutes. This meant their $24,032 prize was worth $22,251 per hour! There were some awesome players at the six-handed final table, including runner-up Bruno “botteonpoker” Botteon and third-place finisher Benjamin “bencb789” Rolle. The day, however, belonged to former Sunday Million champion Daenarys T. PlacePlayerCountryPrize 1Daenarys TNetherlands$24,032 2Bruno “botteonpoker” BotteonBrazil$18,451 3Benjamin “bencb789” RolleAustria$14,166 4Viktor “papan9_p$” UstimovRussia$10,876 5blackaces93Poland$8,350 6Andy “wiisssppppaa” TaylorUnited Kingdom$6,410 Other Highlights From PokerStars 13shaun – first-place in the $1,050 Sunday High Roller for $60,576Aleksei “AS Leshiy” Smirnov – first-place in the $215 Bounty Builder for $31,476*RaiseUpBlind – first-place in he $1,050 Sunday Cooldown for $29,468*yuhei33 – first-place in the $109 Bounty Builder for $29,419*Felipe “lipe piv” Boianovsky – first-place in the $215 Bounty Builder for $29,289*babecallme – first-place in the $109 Sunday Cooldown for $27,227*Black88 – first-place in the $215 Sunday Warm-Up for $17,941Artur “marathur1” Martirosian – first-place in the $1,050 Sunday Warm-Up for $17,814planty07/08 – first-place in the $109 Sunday Kickoff for $15,407Chris “ImDaNuts” Oliver – first-place in the Hotter $215 for $13,872*Dominik “Bounatirou” Nitsche – first-place in the $215 Fat Sunday for $11,782Christian “WATnlos” Rudolph – first-place in the $530 Sunday Marathon for $11,116 *includes bounty payments Get Ready for 107 MicroMillions Events Across Only Four Days! maestro1908 Grabs the $100,000 Sunday Mega Deep Title at 888poker The $100,000 Sunday Mega Deep had been hitting its guarantee lately but it reverted to type on February 14 when 892 players bought in to leave 888poker nursing a $10,800 overlay. “maestro1908” netted the $16,350 top prize after defeating the United Kingdom’s “needabridge” heads-up, leaving the Brit to bank $11,900. The $30,000 Sunday Challenge PKO performed much better with the 335 entrants ensuring the $30,000 guarantee was beaten by $3,500. “troms18” was the last player standing, a result that saw $6,327 head to their account. Swedish star “VnilaVader” was the tournament’s runner-up; they scooped $3,464 with bounties included. 888poker Giving Away $100,000 in 24/7 Freeroll Festival All This Month The Stars Group is a majority shareholder in Oddschecker Global Media, the parent company of PokerNews.
คาสิโน โบนัส 100% คาสิโน โบนัส100% เฮงๆ 666 คาสิโน หวยออนไลน์ คาสิโน
Colonial Downs Proposes Casino Resort in Dumfries
By admin | | 0 Comments |

Rosie’s Gaming Emporium opened doors on January 8. It is a 19,000-square-foot gaming center with 95 video slots, located in the Triangle Shopping Center in Dumfries. Colonial Downs, the property’s owner, now proposes another building, which is a massive $389 million casino resort on the grounds of Potomac Landfill, a debris junkyard on the edge of town. The future facility would be called “The Rose” and would be the first in Virginia with this size, providing such gaming options. According to the plan for “The Rose”, the facility will consist of 50,000 square feet of gaming space, a 250-seat sports bar, as well as other bars and restaurants, 200 hotel rooms, a theater with 1,500 seats and 7,000 square feet of meeting space. Colonial Downs, which owns Rosie’s and operates a racetrack in New Kent County near Richmond, as well as four other Rosie’s emporiums across the state, will pitch its idea today during a 7 a.m. Dumfries Town Council meeting. The new facility is hoped to bring a lot of profit to the town. It is expected to create 640 jobs that pay $15 an hour wage. 96 managers will be hired to work at The Rose and they will make an average of $70,000 a year. According to Colonial Downs, the new casino would generate $11.3 million a year in new tax revenue for Prince William County and nearly $80,000 a year for Dumfries. If the pitch is accepted, construction of the new casino will start in August this year, which means that Potomac Landfill will be closed 11 years earlier than planned. The casino will take 22 acres of the property with 79 acres remaining that will be converted into a park with sports fields, trails and open space. The town documents stated that the park would open in December 2022 and the casino would open only a month later. This is if everything goes according to plan. The Potomac Landfill The town agreed with the landfill in 2016 to close the facility. The closing date was set for 2032. At that time, the town planned on turning the site into a public park. The problem for the landfill started in 2011 when the neighbors and drivers on the Interstate 95 complained of sulfur smell. It was permeated the surrounding area so the facility needed to shut down. Rosie’s Gaming Emporium is the first gaming facility to open its doors in Northern Virginia. Since its opening, more than 21,000 people have visited the gaming parlor in the shopping center. The property has donated more than $75,000 to charity since it started operating and has created 100 jobs for the locals. Its establishment was made possible by the legalization of gambling in Dumfries in November 2019. A citywide referendum passed with more than 60% of the vote, following an extensive advertising campaign by Colonial Downs. Source: “Resort casino proposed to open in Dumfries in January 2023”, Potomac Local, January 15, 2021
เกมส์ยิ่งปลา คาสิโน ฟรีเครดิต ฟรีเครดิตทดลองเล่น คาสิโน เกมส์ คาสิโน ออนไลน์ บ่อนออนไลน์ คาสิโน ออนไลน์ได้เงินจริง
British Boxing Board of Control head: ‘These are not crooked decisions. But there are flaws in the system’
By admin | | 0 Comments |

The British Boxing Board of Control's Robert Smith talks to Matt Christie following yet another controversial night in a British ring There have been suggestions that Josh Warrington should have been pulled out sooner. What was your perception of the main event from your position at ringside? I’m sitting six metres back behind a perspex screen. The people closer are the judges and the referee. I spoke to Howard [Foster, the referee] after the bout. In all but name, Josh Warrington was a world champion. Although he was hurt, Howard tells me Josh’s eyes were clear and, when asked, he said, ‘I’m alright, Howard.’ So he addressed the referee by his name. So Howard let it continue. You will notice that a couple of times, Howard was concerned about Josh’s jaw so he’s gone to have a look in the corner and Josh was readily talking. Also, during the bout – after the fourth – Josh was talking to his opponent. So Howard felt that he should be given the benefit of the doubt and be allowed to continue. I actually thought Josh was clawing his way back into it. So with all that in mind – Howard’s experience, that Josh’s eyes were clear, he was talking and he was fighting back plus the fact that Josh was a world champion, it was an important fight, his qualities are well known and other people have come back from similar situations to win – Howard made the call to let the fight continue. With that in mind, that Howard knows Josh as a fighter and made a decision because of that, would the same chances have been given to Lara if he’d have been in similar trouble? People are assuming things. The first priority of the referee is the safety of the boxer. Once he’s decided that he can continue then other factors may come in. How is he recovering? He knows Josh has an experienced corner – now that’s not shifting responsibility, it’s a fact that has to be taken into consideration. And I would hope that if Lara had been in the same position, if he had responded in the same way, the fight would have continued also. Were you uncomfortable at any point watching the fight develop? First of all, what took everyone by surprise, was the shock of what was happening; I was shocked that Josh went over as he did. It was a good shot and he was obviously hurt. His legs were stiff and you could see he was not his normal self but he’d just been hit with a very good shot. But yes, I am always concerned if anybody is in that position. Will Howard have to face any hearing? It’s too early to say. I’ve spoken to him but I am awaiting reports to come in regarding the whole tournament. But from initial discussions, he acted in the proper way. To my mind he’s a world class official and people will say he got it wrong, people will say he gave the boy the benefit of the doubt. There are numerous examples of fighters being given the benefit of the doubt and going on to win the fight. What was your reaction to the scores in the Zelfa Barrett-Kiko Martinez fight? I can tell you this: The closest people to the action are the judges and the referee. I am six metres back and I had Barrett winning by a couple of rounds. Two metres behind me is the promoters. Now, when I spoke to Eddie Hearn, he thought that Barrett had nicked it by a round. The commentary teams are significantly further back – they’re in a box – and they had it a draw. Further back still, at an angle, you’ve got the pundits like Johnny Nelson and Adam Booth. So the further you went back the more the perception of the result changes. My own opinion was that Martinez was full of industry but a lot of the punches, his hooks and swings, were landing on the gloves whereas Barrett was landing the cleaner shots. Now people can interpret that in many ways. You had two judges who had exactly the same score (118-111). Now I’m not defending anyone but that’s a fact. So you look closer and the judges only agreed on five of the 12 rounds. In the remaining seven, there were three rounds where one judge scored it even and there was a further two rounds where there was a complete split – one went for the red corner, one went for the blue corner and another judge called it even. That indicates to me that they were close rounds. With the current system, a close round can be 10-9 and a wide round can be 10-9 and maybe that’s where something needs to be changed. That’s where we get the difference of opinion. In your position, can you trigger a change of thinking in regard to the scoring? The whole world needs to change. I have stood up at sanctioning body conventions and said we need to consider making a wide round 10-8 and a round where a knockdown is scored, 10-7. But just because there’s a knockdown doesn’t make it 10-8 now if it’s a flash knockdown. It’s down to interpretation but I do believe there is value in looking at the system. What is your opinion on open scoring? We don’t permit it here because there could be a crowd reaction. I also think you could get a situation where a fighter is so far ahead they just get on their bike and run which would take away the endeavour. I quite like that you don’t know the result until the end. We’re not like football or rugby where you get points or goals on the board. We are the only sport where you don’t know the result until the end. I do think that half the problem is that someone gets a feeling that someone has won it and they haven’t. I think on Saturday, because of his endeavour, a lot of people thought that Martinez won when I don’t believe he did win. There is clearly an issue in the viewers’ perception so frequently differing from the actual result. It can be wildly different and that is also different to any other sport. I understand that. But from your position at home you can be swayed by the commentary. Is there more that the Board of Control can do, in the face of accusations of incompetence and even worse, in terms of how you react to the controversial decisions? We get the reports, we read the reports and if we’re concerned about anyone’s performance we act upon it. I do think that the current time period without crowds, where the majority of people who are voicing their opinion aren’t in the crowd or aren’t at ringside, has something to do with this. Again, those who are in the arena have different views. Some are one metre away, others are 100 metres away. Some can see replays, some can’t. There are lots of factors why people are disagreeing with results but that doesn’t mean it’s crooked or people are incompetent. I do respect the opinion of everyone but that doesn’t mean that they’re right. I thought Barrett won by two rounds and I accept that people will disagree with that. What was your reaction to Eddie Hearn saying that it will be difficult to get fighters to the UK because of the ongoing controversy? Of course it hurts. I don’t think it’s helpful that people are saying that but I do understand why people are saying that. It all stems back to how the fight is scored. You can have a 12-rounder that’s a rip-roarer and someone wins every round by 10-9 and it then looks on paper like it’s been a whitewash when it hasn’t been a whitewash. That’s where the problem lies. Are the judges encouraged, if a round is close, to score it one way or the other rather than scoring it even? Yes. I say to people they need to find a winner from each round. Does that not create a problem when the best solution to scoring a round that’s close is to score it level? I’m not going to argue with that but I do feel, in the space of three minutes, you can generally find a winner. I’m not saying they HAVE to find a winner in every round. A lot of the time we can forget what happened in the first minute of the round, or in the first half of the fight. You know as well as I do that you can watch a fight at ringside, then go back and watch on TV and it looks like a completely different fight. These are not crooked decisions. But I do believe there are flaws in the system that affect how the fights are scored that can be looked at. The key is to ensure everyone in the world looks as well because it’s imperative that all judges score the same way.
หวยออนไลน์ เล่นหวยออนไลน์ ไพ่ออนไลน์ เว็บ คาสิโน คาสิโน777
Daily Cash Smash 2.0 Live Now At The Cash Tables On PokerBaazi
By admin | | 0 Comments |

Starting from 16th February to 28th February, PokerBaazi will be hosting the Daily Cash Smash! 13 Days, daily leaderboards and prize pool of INR 21.45 Lakhs! The players can grind any of the three (NLHE/PLO-4/PLO-5) cash tables and all the chips won from the leaderboards will be withdrawable (separate for all three variants)!  All players will have a chance to win from a daily prize pool of INR 1.65 Lakhs! All you have to do is play the cash tables between 10:00 AM – 4:00 AM!  The Daily Leaderboard prize pool  5/10 & 10/25 (Texas Hold’Em): Daily 8k Leaderboard 1/2 & 2/5 (Texas Hold’Em): Daily 4k Leaderboard 25/50 & 50/100 (Texas Hold’Em): Daily 12k Leaderboard 5/10 & 10/25 (PLO-5): Daily 6k Leaderboard 25/50 & 50/100 (PLO-5): Daily 15k Leaderboard 1/2 & 2/5 (PLO-4): Daily 2k Leaderboard 10/25 & 25/50 (PLO-4): Daily 8k Leaderboard It’s time to grind again on PokerBaazi, but this time, it’s going to have to be on the cash felts! Head over to the link below for more information about the Daily Cash Smash 2.0 and Leaderboards For more information about the latest poker promotions and poker news, keep reading PokerShots!  Post Views: 61
คาสิโน ออนไลน์ ฟรีเครดิต โปรโมชั่น คาสิโน คาสิโน 168 คาสิโน168 คาสิโน ออนไลน์ 888
Silver Trails’ Slot Review
By admin | | 0 Comments |

A title like Silver Trails offers a Wild West theme. Notwithstanding this well known theme, this present Novomatic’s slot has 5 reels, 3 rows and 243 different ways to win. In spite of these features, the game has various and interesting things on offer.The Wilds and Scatters are essential for the combination and they carry multipliers with them just as a Jackpot Feature which allows you to win one of 4 different bonanzas. A bet feature is likewise available.Betting and Prizes Much the same as in most slot games, you’ll need to match identical images to get prizes. You can get 3 images in a combo and win a prize. Be that as it may, you can likewise get 4 or 5 of them and improve prize. As said earlier, this game allows you to win one out of 4 bonanzas. They are the Mini, Minor, Major, and Grand bonanzas. Silver Trails has a lot to offer.Silver Trails’ Slot Features Since the royal card images are very famous you’ll see them in this title too. They are joined by the 10 image just as images that fit the theme. These are the revolver and bullet, the cowboy and others.Normally, there are some exceptional images in the combination. The Wild is the first and it seems stacked on reels 2 and 4. Other than this one, you additionally have the Silver Star image which is the Scatter one. At the point when it lands on reels 1, 3, or 5 you’ll get a multiplier that equals the sum on the stars that landed.Also, the Scatter is liable for another feature too. However, for that, you’ll need at least 6 Scatters to trigger this feature. When this occurs, the images that set off the feature remain and place, and you get 3 Bonus spins. The counter moves to 3 when you land another Scatter.On the off chance that you are able to cover the whole reels with the Silver Star image, you’ll get the Grand Jackpot. Then again, you can get any of the other 3. Strong multipliers are additionally important for this feature and they can get as high as 20x your stake.The last feature that allows you to increase your rewards is the Gamble feature. In any case, it’s a dangerous feature as you can lose them on the off chance that you don’t play it right.Theme and Design With Silver Trails slot fans are given another title that is motivated by the Wild West. The images and the background of the game look stunning and the game mechanics are impeccable. At long last, the game’s engineers didn’t mix out the opportunity to make this a mobile-friendly game too.ConclusionSilver Trails takes you to the Wild West and allows you to earn huge prizes. Because of the Jackpot feature you can leave with 1 out of 4 magnificent bonanzas. On the other hand, you can try our the bet feature and appreciate the multipliers that come with the Silver Stars. Wilds are in the combination too.
เกมส์ยิ่งปลา คาสิโน ฟรีเครดิต ฟรีเครดิตทดลองเล่น คาสิโน เกมส์ คาสิโน ออนไลน์ บ่อนออนไลน์ คาสิโน ออนไลน์ได้เงินจริง
Richard Downey explains the power of the US sports betting market
By admin | | 0 Comments |

No one in the industry can underestimate the old fashioned values of building trust amongst customers. Richard Downey, Senior VP for Connections by the Specialist Works, understands that more than most. He sat down with Calvinayre.com’s Becky Liggero Fontana to share his insights on the U.S. sports betting market.Downey emphasized leveraging relationships from prior careers. “I was publisher of a magazine called Poker Player and I moved from there into the agency. I’ve been able to maintain an involvement in the gaming industry by having clients in the space,” Downey said.Downey is a firm believer that operators still require a that branding plays an integral part in building trust with customers in the highly competitive U.S. sports betting market. “In the gaming sector there is an element of credibility and trustworthiness that exists everywhere, but especially in the U.S. market. Getting access to online gaming in the U.S. market for the past period of time has not been completely legitimated. Gaming is being rebranded as mainstream entertainment and it’s really important that the brands that come through with it do a good job for the customers.”Downey pointed out that new operators have to consider the Vegas perceptions of gaming when it comes to brand marketing and alignment.“For a long time gaming has been synonymous with Las Vegas and therefore it’s completely logical that a lot of the Vegas gaming companies are using their brands to do that job of legitimization and credibility. If a gaming operator is trying to break into the mainstream market in the U.S. then I think having a credible brand behind you, either through brand recognition or through marketing is a good way of making people believe that you know that their gaming environment is a safe one,” he said.In the full interview, Downey gives advice for new operators for developing brand strategy in the U.S. sports betting market. And if you haven’t yet, watch all of our videos as they go up by subscribing to the CalvinAyre.com YouTube channel.
แทงบอล คาสิโน sa คาสิโน คาสิโน ออนไลน์ มือถือ คาสิโนtrue wallet ไม่มีขั้นต่ำ คาสิโนbet
Alderney Gambling Commission
By admin | | 0 Comments |

เนื่องจากบทบาทของคณะกรรมการการพนันของ Alderney มีความสำคัญในอุตสาหกรรมของเราและเป็นหนึ่งในหน่วยงานกำกับดูแลหลักที่เราพึ่งพาในการควบคุมคาสิโนออนไลน์ตอนนี้เราจะให้ภาพรวมของคุณสมบัติหลักของ AGCC เราจะเริ่มต้นด้วยประวัติสั้น ๆ และคำจำกัดความของ AGCC จากนั้นเราจะดำเนินการตามกิจกรรมและความรับผิดชอบ นอกจากนี้เราจะกล่าวถึงคาสิโนที่มีชื่อเสียงบางแห่งที่มีใบอนุญาต AGCC สุดท้ายนี้เราจะแจ้งให้คุณทราบว่าคุณจะติดต่อ AGCC ได้อย่างไรและจะช่วยคุณได้อย่างไร AGCC - คืออะไร? Alderney Gambling Control Commission (AGCC) ก่อตั้งขึ้นในปี พ.ศ. 2543 เป็นหน่วยงานกำกับดูแลอิสระที่ควบคุมผู้ให้บริการ iGaming ในนามของรัฐ Alderney ร่วมกับคณะกรรมการการพนันแห่งสหราชอาณาจักรและหน่วยงานการเล่นเกมมอลตาทำให้มั่นใจได้ว่าผู้ประกอบการให้โอกาสผู้เล่นในการเล่นคาสิโนออนไลน์ที่ปลอดภัย ชื่อ: Alderney Gambling Control Commission เว็บไซต์: www.gamblingcontrol.org ที่อยู่: St Anne's House, Queen Elizabeth II Street, Alderney, Channel Islands, GY9 3TB อีเมล: info@agcc.gg โทรศัพท์: +44 (0) 1481 825500 Alderney Gambling Control ค่าคอมมิชชั่น - สิ่งที่ AGCC ได้รับอนุญาตให้ออกใบอนุญาตและใบรับรอง ใบอนุญาตการพนันอิเล็กทรอนิกส์มีสองประเภท สิ่งแรกเกี่ยวข้องกับการลงทะเบียนและการตรวจสอบผู้เล่นสัญญาและเงินทุน อย่างที่สองเกี่ยวข้องกับการจัดการแพลตฟอร์มการพนัน ทั้งสองประเภทนี้เชื่อมต่อกันอย่างประณีต Alderney Gaming Control Commission ได้กำหนดเป้าหมายที่ชัดเจน วัตถุประสงค์หลักคือการปกป้องและปรับปรุงชื่อให้เป็นเขตอำนาจการกำกับดูแลชั้นหนึ่ง การพนันทั้งหมดดำเนินไปอย่างซื่อสัตย์และยุติธรรม การพนันออนไลน์รวมถึงการจัดการการดำเนินการและการระดมทุนนั้นปราศจากอิทธิพลทางอาญา กฎระเบียบและการตรวจสอบที่เข้มงวดจะช่วยปกป้องเยาวชนและผู้ที่อ่อนแอ ยิ่งไปกว่านั้น AGCC จะทดสอบการปฏิบัติตามข้อกำหนดของผู้รับใบอนุญาต เพื่อทำการตรวจสอบทางเทคนิคอย่างสม่ำเสมอ AGCC Alderney จะทำงานอย่างใกล้ชิดกับห้องปฏิบัติการทดสอบที่ได้รับการรับรองหรือห้องทดสอบทั่วโลก สุดท้าย AGCC ให้ความโปร่งใสแก่ผู้เล่นและผู้ปฏิบัติงาน ในเว็บไซต์คุณสามารถค้นหาชื่อของผู้รับใบอนุญาต แต่ยังรวมถึงชื่อของผู้สมัครด้วย Alderney Gambling Control Commission คาสิโนเนื่องจาก Alderney Gambling Control Commission (AGCC) เป็นผู้ออกใบรับรองและใบอนุญาตที่สำคัญในอุตสาหกรรมเกมออนไลน์คุณมักจะเจอชื่อนี้เมื่อมองหาเว็บไซต์การพนันที่ดีที่สุดในสหราชอาณาจักร นี่คือผู้ให้บริการคาสิโนออนไลน์ชั้นนำบางรายที่แสดงโลโก้ของ AGCC บนเว็บไซต์ของตนอย่างภาคภูมิใจเพื่อพิสูจน์ว่าพวกเขามีใบอนุญาตที่ถูกต้องจากคณะกรรมการ ทำไมต้องเล่นที่ AGCC Casino? แต่ทำไมคุณควรเลือกหนึ่งในคาสิโน Alderney Gambling Control Commission? มีหลายสาเหตุ ก่อนอื่นคุณไม่ควรพิจารณาเล่นคาสิโนที่ไม่มีการควบคุมด้วยซ้ำ AGCC เป็นหนึ่งในเว็บไซต์ที่ดีที่สุดในการควบคุมเว็บไซต์เกมออนไลน์และส่งเสริมการพนันอย่างมีความรับผิดชอบ นั่นทำให้ผู้เล่นได้เปรียบมากมาย โลโก้ Alderney บนเว็บไซต์คาสิโนรับประกันว่า: การปกป้องผู้เล่น: ผู้ปฏิบัติงานจะต้องปฏิบัติตามพระราชบัญญัติการปกป้องข้อมูลและจัดการข้อมูลที่ละเอียดอ่อนอย่างเหมาะสม นอกจากนี้ผู้ที่มีความเสี่ยงและเด็กจะได้รับความสนใจเป็นพิเศษ ในที่สุดเงินของผู้เล่นจะถูกแยกออกจากเงินของคาสิโนดังนั้นการรักษาเงินของผู้เล่นไม่ว่าจะเกิดอะไรขึ้นก็ตาม การเล่นเกมอย่างยุติธรรม: คาสิโนออนไลน์ผ่านการตรวจสอบอุปกรณ์ตามปกติโดยห้องปฏิบัติการทางเทคนิคที่ได้รับอนุญาตซึ่งทำงานร่วมกับ Alderney Commission การดูแลและทดสอบทางเทคนิคอย่างสม่ำเสมอมีจุดมุ่งหมายเพื่อให้แน่ใจว่าเกมทั้งหมดมีความยุติธรรมและ Random Number Generator (RNG) เป็นแบบสุ่ม ความรับผิดชอบของผู้ดำเนินการ: หากไม่มีความรับผิดชอบคาสิโนออนไลน์จะทำทุกอย่างที่พวกเขาต้องการและผู้เล่นจะต้องสูญเสีย อย่างไรก็ตามคาสิโน Alderney Gambling Control Commission ยืนหยัดตามคำพูดของพวกเขา หากผู้ปฏิบัติงานหลงทางจากการกระทำผู้เล่นทุกคนสามารถติดต่อกับ AGCC - ติดต่อพวกเขาหรือยื่นเรื่องร้องเรียน นอกเหนือจากความโปร่งใสของ AGCC ที่เราได้กล่าวไปแล้ว Alderney Gambling Commission ยังสามารถเข้าถึงได้ง่ายทางโทรศัพท์แฟกซ์อีเมลแบบฟอร์มบนเว็บหรืออีเมล เลือกวิธีการสื่อสารที่คุณต้องการเพื่อขอข้อมูลเพิ่มเติมเกี่ยวกับกิจกรรมขององค์กรหรือเพื่อยื่นเรื่องร้องเรียน ข้อเท็จจริงที่น่าสนใจ: คุณรู้หรือไม่ว่า AGCC Alderney ต้องการช่วยคุณในการสื่อสารกับคาสิโนออนไลน์ที่พวกเขาควบคุม? ตัวอย่างเช่นหากคุณคิดว่าคุณถูกทำร้าย แต่ผู้ให้บริการคาสิโนไม่ตอบสนองต่อข้อความของคุณโปรดติดต่อ Alderney อันที่จริงแล้วเนื่องจากเป้าหมายประการหนึ่งของ Alderney Gambling Commission คือเพื่อให้แน่ใจว่าผู้เล่นได้รับการปฏิบัติอย่างเป็นธรรมและการเล่นเกมดำเนินไปอย่างตรงไปตรงมาคุณจึงสามารถพึ่งพาความช่วยเหลือจากหน่วยงานที่กำกับดูแลได้ ติดต่อ Alderney - ยื่นเรื่องร้องเรียนเกี่ยวกับกรณีใด ๆ ที่คุณเชื่อว่าผู้รับอนุญาตซึ่งเป็นคาสิโนออนไลน์ได้ละเมิดข้อกำหนดใด ๆ ตามที่ AGCC กำหนด คำถามที่พบบ่อยเกี่ยวกับ Alderney Gambling Commission เราได้พยายามนำเสนอ Alderney Gambling Control Commission (AGCC) วิธีที่ดีที่สุดเท่าที่จะเป็นไปได้โดยไม่ต้องลงรายละเอียดมากเกินไป เราได้อธิบายว่า AGCC คืออะไรและทำหน้าที่อะไร นอกจากนี้เรายังได้ชี้แจงอย่างชัดเจนว่า Alderney Commission สามารถช่วยคุณในการสื่อสารกับคาสิโนออนไลน์ได้อย่างไร สุดท้ายนี้เราได้ให้ชื่อคาสิโน AGCC ชั้นนำแก่คุณ ตอนนี้เราจะตอบคำถามยอดนิยมที่ผู้เล่นมีเกี่ยวกับ AGCC ✔️ AGCC ย่อมาจากอะไร? AGCC ย่อมาจาก Alderney Gambling Control Commission เป็นหนึ่งในองค์กรกำกับดูแลที่น่านับถือที่สุดใน iGaming AGCC ทำงานอย่างใกล้ชิดกับคณะกรรมการการพนันแห่งสหราชอาณาจักรเพื่อรักษาและรับรองประสบการณ์การเล่นเกมออนไลน์ที่ปลอดภัยสำหรับผู้เล่นในสหราชอาณาจักร 📑คณะกรรมาธิการ Alderney ทำอะไร? คณะกรรมการควบคุมการพนันของ Alderney (AGCC) ออกใบรับรองและใบอนุญาตให้กับผู้ประกอบการคาสิโนที่ปฏิบัติตามกฎที่เข้มงวดของคณะกรรมการเพื่อความปลอดภัยของผู้เล่นความยุติธรรมในเกมและการปกป้องเยาวชนและผู้ที่มีความเสี่ยง นอกจากนี้ยังช่วยให้มั่นใจได้ว่าผู้ปฏิบัติงานจะปฏิบัติตามโดยการทดสอบอย่างสม่ำเสมอ 🃏อะไรทำให้คาสิโน AGCC ปลอดภัย? หากผู้ให้บริการแสดงโลโก้ AGCC บนเว็บไซต์ของพวกเขาไซต์เกมนั้นจะเป็นสถานที่ที่ปลอดภัยที่คุณสามารถเล่นเกมด้วยเงินจริงและคาดหวังผลลัพธ์ที่ยุติธรรมและเที่ยงตรงด้วย RNG แบบสุ่มอย่างแท้จริง คาสิโน Alderney Gambling Control Commission เป็นตัวเลือกที่ยอดเยี่ยมสำหรับผู้เล่นในสหราชอาณาจักร 🎰ข้อดีของการเล่นที่เว็บไซต์คาสิโน AGCC คืออะไร? คุณอาจสงสัยว่าข้อดีของคาสิโน AGCC คืออะไร เนื่องจากคณะกรรมการการพนันของ Alderney ทำงานเพื่อให้แน่ใจว่าประสบการณ์การพนันออนไลน์ของสหราชอาณาจักรนั้นดีที่สุดไซต์คาสิโน AGCC จึงมีคุณลักษณะที่เป็นเลิศมากมายเช่นการปกป้องผู้เล่นการเล่นเกมที่ยุติธรรม 🎲 AGCC ทำอะไรให้ผู้เล่นได้บ้าง? AGCC มีผลประโยชน์สูงสุดของผู้เล่นในสหราชอาณาจักรเป็นหัวใจสำคัญซึ่งรวมถึง แต่ไม่ จำกัด เพียงความปลอดภัยและความสะดวกสบายของผู้เล่น ดังนั้นหากคุณมีปัญหาที่คาสิโน AGCC ปฏิเสธที่จะแก้ไขคุณสามารถดำเนินการต่อและใช้แบบฟอร์มการติดต่อ AGCC หรือวิธีการสื่อสารอื่นเพื่อแจ้งปัญหา หรือคุณสามารถยื่นเรื่องร้องเรียนอย่างเป็นทางการ
คาสิโน มาเก๊า คาสิโน ปอยเปต ออนไลน์ คาสิโน UFABET คาสิโน 66 คาสิโน66
What Scouting Reports Got Wrong about Justin Jefferson
By admin | | 0 Comments |

Foremost, scouting reports on Minnesota Vikings wide receiver Justin Jefferson were primarily credible. It would be fallacious to assert that Jefferson was an untapped gem. The only oddity in the aftermath of the 2020 season is that Henry Ruggs III, Jerry Jeudy, CeeDee Lamb, and Jalen Reagor were chosen in the draft ahead of Jefferson.  Why? Because Jefferson – as has been widely broadcast – set the NFL rookie record for receiving yards with 1,400. He was also chipped in seven touchdowns. The closest rookie to Jefferson in the yards metric was Lamb who fell short of the rookie-yard mark by 465 yards. And to be fair, fellow first-year wideout, Chase Claypool, pulled down two more touchdowns than Jefferson.  Other than that, the Vikings selection of Jefferson was a 500-foot homerun. By midseason, the 21-year-old was the team’s WR1. He was forcing Vikings enthusiasts to channel memories of Randy Moss in 1998 (minus the gobs of touchdowns). Jefferson is also affable. To date, he has shown no diva-like qualities and even goes out of his way to exhibit inverse vibes. He was congratulatory of Justin Herbert for winning the meaningful version of the Rookie of the Year award. In a solemn manner, Jefferson seems like a “locker room guy.” So, what did the scouts get wrong? There is a lot, but here are some of the biggies. “Could Be Better Off as WR” This one is comical because the opposite of the proclamation became evident early on.  Among seven weaknesses of Jefferson’s game, Walter Football declared that the LSU pass-catcher might be best served as a complementary piece to a true-blue WR1. This is the full casserole of Jefferson supposed weaknesses per Walter Football:• Not a burner• May lack deep speed for the NFL• Leaner frame• May not be a big separation receiver• Could be better off as a No. 2 receiver• Could stand to fill out his frame• Should add strength The “Could be better off as a No. 2 recevier” knock on Jefferson is laughable because he was targeted more than any other rookie since 2015 – and emphatically answered the call. He commanded 125 targets – which might have been too low – while setting an NFL record. Jefferson can handle the WR1 title. It took about three weeks for the world to learn this. “Dominated the Slot…” Oh, yes, the insult thrown at pre-2019  Stefon Diggs is in full effect here. A “slot” guy was the most boisterous criticism of Jefferson’s skill set before he joined the NFL. He played alongside oodles of talent in LSU, so folks presumed he was maybe an overhyped slant sultan. Wrong.  This one was cooked up by Bleacher Report. And again, in fairness, sometimes players just rapidly improve or mature. Such was the case with Jefferson.  Matt Miller of Bleacher Report wrote this of Jefferson’s potential shortcomings:• Dominated from the slot in an offense loaded with offensive weapons in 2019.• Tape makes you question his ability to create space on his own.• Almost no experience against press coverage.• Drops show up a decent amount on his tape, enough to be a concern. Jefferson led the entire NFL in 25+ yard receptions in 2020. That’s right – more than deep-ball artists like Tyreek Hill, DeAndre Hopkins, and D.K. Metcalf. Jefferson grabbed 16 catches of 25 yards or more. If this is the prognosis of slot-only pass-catchers, well, more men should focus on slot assignments in college. It bodes well for NFL performance. Deep-ball prowess was no problem for Jefferson in 2020. He flat-out stretched the field. “Technique as a Route Runner Could Use Cleaning Up” Along with Jerry Jeudy early on in the pandemic season, Jefferson’s route-running was not suspect. In fact, it was applauded. Onlookers were awed at seamlessness on display as Jefferson did not provide one iota of route-running deficiency – especially for a player that replaced the departed-to-Buffalo Diggs. On the field, Jefferson and Diggs resembled each other for route-running acumen, and Diggs is a route-running demigod. And remember – Jefferson is 21 years old. Diggs is a wide receiver in the prime of his career, six years the senior of Jefferson.  One cannot struggle with route-running and snag 1,400 receiving yards. The two assertions are incongruent.  This is what DraftWire said of Jefferson’s rooms for improvement: “While Jefferson proved to be capable of separating at the collegiate level, one has to wonder how much of that was related to scheme. He’s a good athlete, but his technique as a route runner could use some cleaning up. His footwork can be a little sloppy at times, and he can struggle to sink his hips into his breaks and make sharp cuts.” These are falsehoods.
คาสิโน888 คาสิโน88 เกม คาสิโน เกมส์ คาสิโน ts911 คาสิโน ออนไลน์
What to Do Versus a Big River Bet (3 Simple Tips)
By admin | | 0 Comments |

This article was written by blackrain79.com contributor Fran Ferlan. Playing the river optimally is what makes or breaks your winrate.  It’s the biggest money street and you often have to make a decision for your whole stack. The amount of money in the pot by the river often paralyzes players, because they are overly focused on the pot size, which affects their decision making process.  So what should you do versus a big river bet? Well, when you ask a broad question, you tend to get a broad answer, so here it is: it depends. There’s a lot of factors to consider here: your opponent type, previous action, board runout, pot odds, your relative hand strength, just to name a few. Not a huge help, so let’s try to break it down in this article. 1. Try to Bluff Catch Versus Loose and Aggressive Players Let’s start with the type of player we are up against. Most players will primarily bet for value when they fire off a big river bet, especially at the micros.  The only exception would be loose and aggressive players. This is true for both regulars and aggrofish. You can generally call wider against aggrofish than you would against LAG regulars. The looser and more aggressive the player, the wider you should call them down.  This is an advanced poker strategy that works extremely well in today's small stakes games. BlackRain79 discusses it in more detail in this video: So in practice, this means that sometimes you should call them down with hands you wouldn’t be comfortable calling with otherwise, like top pair weak kicker, second pair, two pair on a wet board and such.  It’s important to trust your judgment in these situations, otherwise you’re better off folding earlier if you suspect you’re going to get barrelled and pushed out of the pot.  However, just because someone is loose and aggressive, doesn’t mean they will have only bluffs in their range, especially on the river. The board runout is an important factor when deciding how wide you should call. Generally speaking, the drier the board, the wider you can bluff catch.  Why?  Because your opponent sees the same community cards you see, and if they bet huge on the river, they’re basically saying that the board doesn’t scare them and they don’t care what you are holding.  On the other hand, if the river bricks (i.e. a river card doesn’t change anything significantly, because it fails to complete any straight or flush draws, for example), your more observant opponents might put you on a busted draw and try to bluff you out of the pot.  They can also have a busted draw of their own, as decently winning LAGs know the power of semibluffing on earlier streets, and know a large majority of their opponents won’t have the heart to call down their triple barrel without a monster hand. In this situation, you should look for an opportunity to bluff catch with your top pair or second pair, for example. Bear in mind that this isn’t something you should try to do often, as these kinds of situations are more of an exception than the rule, but who doesn’t love a good hero call from time to time? If you’re able to pick off a huge pot with a mediocre hand, it can do wonders to your bottom line, as most players wouldn’t have the nerve to pull it off.  It will also make it more difficult to play against you, because you’ll show that you are able to call down in less than ideal circumstances, and won’t be pushed around.  Just a disclaimer:  Know that it’s a high-risk, high reward play, and should be attempted only in specific circumstances, against specific opponents, on specific boards and against specific previous action.  You should base it on sound information and tells you’ve picked up on, not just the feeling that this guy is bluffing, I’m gonna call him down with my Ace-high. Big River Bet Example Hand #1 Effective stack size: 100BB. You are dealt A♦8♦ in the BB. A LAG reg open-raises to 3x from the BU. SB folds, you call. Pot: 6.5BB. Flop: T♣7♠6♥ You check. Villain bets 3BB. You call. Pot: 12.5BB. Turn: 2♣ You check. Villain bets 6BB. You call. Pot: 24.5BB. River: A♠ You check. Villain bets 16BB. You: ??? You should call. This is a great spot to bluff catch based on our opponent type, previous action, and the board runout. Let’s break it down. A loose and aggressive reg open raises from the button. We assume their range is very wide here, probably close to 50% of all hands. We have a decent speculative hand. We can even opt to 3-bet light from time to time, but we decide to flat call. We flop a gutshot straight draw, and we expect the villain to fire off a c-bet with pretty much a 100% of their range, which he does. The turn doesn’t change much for us, except it puts a possible flush draw on the board. The villain double barrels, but since not much has changed for us from flop to turn, and are getting about 3:1 odds on a call, we decide to continue. The river doesn’t complete our gutshot, but we do end up improving to a top pair. Is it good enough for a call? Let’s look at it from the villain’s perspective.  We didn’t give him any reason to assume we are holding an Ace. In fact, we checked three times, so if they had to put us on a range, they would assume we have a Tx hand, a busted straight or a flush draw.  Conveniently, that’s a part of their perceived range as well. The river comes with a scare card, so it wouldn’t be a surprise if they tried to buy the pot there. Are we going to be good a hundred percent of the time? Of course not, but we don’t need to be. This is something that BlackRain79 talks about in Modern Small Stakes. They have a significant amount of bluffs in their range for our call to be +EV, considering their player type, their open-raising position, our passive lines, non-coordinated board and so on.  When we take all of that into consideration, we can infer that we can call profitably. As for the aggrofish, aka complete maniacs, you can widen your river calling ranges considerably. It is also a high risk, high reward play, but these players are the only ones that will have a significant amount of bluffs on the river.  Why?  Because their ranges are already extremely wide on previous streets, so it’s fair to assume they will get to the river with all kinds of busted draws, Ace-high hands, fourth pair etc. While their aggression can certainly be profitable in the short term, as even they can occasionally catch a monster hand, they will be the most significant long term losers.  You can’t outrun math. So when playing against them, you should be making more hero calls than you would usually be inclined.  Be aware that their maniacal ways are usually short-lived, so you should try to get them to donate their stacks to you before the next guy.  And you usually won’t have the luxury of waiting around for the monster hand to try and trap them.  So next time you find yourself facing a huge river bet against them, go with your gut, take a deep breath and call them down. Your winrate will thank you for it. Make $500+ Per Month in Low Stakes Poker Games With My Free Poker Cheat Sheet Are you having trouble consistently beating low stakes poker games online or live? Are you looking to make a consistent part time income playing these games?  That is why I wrote this free little 50 page poker cheat sheet to give you the exact strategies to start consistently making $500 (or more) per month in low stakes poker games right now. These are the exact poker strategies by the way that I used to create some of the highest winnings in online poker history at the lower limits, as a 10+ year poker pro. And I lay them all out for you step by step in this free guide. Enter your details below and I will send my free poker cheat sheet to your inbox right now. 2. Look for Possible Completed Draws As far as all the other player types are concerned, like fish who aren’t of the aggro persuasion (which is most of them) and TAGs, you should be very careful when calling big river bets. This is especially the case if they donk bet big into you. (A donk bet is a bet made against the previous streets’ aggressor).  Look for possible completed draws and ask yourself if their previous action makes sense that way. If the answer is yes, your overpair or top two pair probably isn’t good enough anymore.  Think of it this way: would you bet big out of position on the river against someone’s previous incessant aggression without a really strong hand? You probably wouldn’t. And neither would the majority of the player pool at the micro stakes.  Big River Bet Example Hand #2 Effective stack size: 100BB. You are dealt A♠Q♠ on the BU. You open-raise to 3x. SB folds, a loose passive fish calls in the BB. Pot: 6.5BB Flop: A♦3♦Q♥ Fish checks. You bet 5BB. Fish calls. Pot: 16.5BB Turn: 8♣ Fish checks. You bet 16.5BB. Fish calls. Pot: 49.5 River: J♦ Fish bets 40BB. You: ??? You should fold. Let’s break down the action street by street. There’s not much to say about preflop. We’re dealt a great hand on the button, and we can assume the recreational player will call us down pretty wide in the big blind. We flop top two pair and should start building the pot as soon as possible. We expect to get called by a bunch of Ax hands, gutshot straight draws, flush draws, you name it. The turn doesn’t change much, but it does add a couple of gutshot draws if our opponent called the flop with hands like JT, J9, or T9, for example.  We’re still miles ahead of villain’s range, so we decide to charge them a premium for their drawing hands. We can even consider overbettting, but we go for a pot sized bet. And we get one of the worst river cards possible. The fish fires off a huge donk bet. There is nothing left for us to do but bemoan our luck and fold begrudgingly.  The Jack on the river completes a number of straight draws and a flush draw. If we go back to preflop, we should expect this particular opponent to have practically all suited junk in their range.  Fish love chasing draws, and they love playing suited junk. Nevermind the fact that the chances of flopping a flush are only 0.8%. Now, we could argue that it’s a fish, they don’t know what they’re doing, they could be bluffing. Or they could have any number of two pair hands we’re ahead of. Fair enough. But if they did have a two pair hand, for example, wouldn’t they go for a check-call option, considering such a scary board?  Even fish can see three diamonds on a board. And yes, they could be bluffing, but there is nothing in their previous history that would suggest that. You should always be on the lookout for disrupting patterns when playing poker.  If an otherwise weak and timid opponent suddenly starts blasting off big bets, they didn’t just randomly decide to mix it up a little. They are politely letting you know they have the nuts. As a rule of thumb in poker in general, calling should be the last option you consider. As the old adage goes, if your hand is good enough for a call, it’s good enough for a raise. 3. Check Your HUD Stats to Make an Informed Decision But how do you know what type of player you’re up against? Well, the most accurate way would be to check their VPIP (voluntarily put money in pot), PFR (preflop raise) and AF (aggression factor) in your poker tracking software HUD.These are statistics which are placed right on your online poker table, beside each of your opponents, which tell you what type of player you are up against. This is highly useful information to have especially in the fast paced, multi-tabling, world of online poker.  These three poker HUD stats alone can give you a pretty good idea of the type of player you’re facing, and only after a hundred hands or so. Of course, the bigger the sample size, the better, but you can draw some general conclusions pretty quickly.  However, as we all know, most hands don’t get to showdown, and while we can make some wide generalizations about some player types, it’s better to have more info than less. If you are using a HUD, you might want to consider adding stats like WWSF, WTSD, and W$SD to accurately assess your opponent’s postflop tendencies. By the way, if you aren't using a poker HUD yet, BlackRain79 shows you how to set up your HUD in less than 5 minutes in this video: So, WWSF stands for Won When Saw Flop, and is a percentage of times a player won the pot after seeing the flop. The lower the WWSF, the weaker the player, meaning they play aggressively with very strong hands only, and conversely, the higher the WWSF, the more they bluff and fight for the pot post flop. Here is a rough estimation of the spectrum.Use These Specific HUD Stats to Make Optimal Decisions Versus a Big River Bet If their WWSF is less than 42%, they are weak and give up too much post flop. They don’t bluff enough, and if they give you action, especially on the big money streets (turn and river) they have a very strong hand. WWSF between 42% and 52% is the average. Of course, the higher the number, the more often they bluff. If their WWSF is bigger than 52%, they bluff way too often. You can call them down widely and use their aggression against them. WTSD stands for Went to Showdown, and shows the % of times a player, well, went to showdown. A player with a WTSD below 20% is an extreme nit, and goes to showdown with very strong hands only. A WTSD between about 24% and 27% is the norm for most winning players. Players with a WTSD above 30% are huge calling stations, and you should value bet them relentlessly. W$SD or Won Money at Showdown (or WSD) indicates the % of times a player won the pot after the showdown. It’s inversely proportional to the WTSD, i.e. a player with a low WTSD will have a big W$SD because they only see the showdown with very strong hands, and huge calling stations will have a low W$SD because they call down with a bunch of garbage hands. Nitty players will have a W$SD of about 60% or more, fishy players about 40% or less. Solid winning players will therefore be right in the middle with about 50%. One very important caveat, these stats require a huge sample size in order to be accurate.  You will need 500 hands at the bare minimum to make any informed assumptions. 1000 hands is a decent sample size, but they get really accurate only after 5000 hands or so. Needless to say, the more they tend towards the extremes of the spectrum, the less hands you need to be sure, and the more you can exploit them by either overbluffing or betting for value, depending on which side they fall. If you want to learn much more about all these HUD stats make sure you check out BlackRain79's popular optimal HUD setup guide. Summary In order to play the river effectively, you need to take into account a number of factors, including, but not limited to: the pot odds, your relative hand strength, board runout, type of opponent you’re up against, previous action and so on. You basically have to apply all of your theoretical knowledge at the same time. While it may seem daunting at first, the more you practice, the more automatic the process will become, and after a while you’ll be able to put your opponents on correct ranges, maybe even zero in on their exact hand. It will certainly take a great deal of practice, because as we know, most hands don’t even get to showdown, and river spots are so rare and unique that it’s hard to even try to answer what to do in these spots in a single article. However, there are some general guidelines you should adhere to: First of all, big river bets usually indicate a strong made hand, especially at the micros. Most players will bet for value, and aren’t really inclined to risk a significant portion of their stack without something to back it up. The only exception would be loose and aggressive players, and maybe some solid tight and aggressive players who know what they’re doing, and know that a well timed aggression can go a long way.  But again, these are quite rare at the micros. So against LAGs, you should try to bluff catch from time to time if you believe they have a significant amount of bluffs in their range.  Just bear in mind that it’s a high variance play, so be prepared to take it in stride when they actually had the nuts all along. Against aggrofish (aka maniac fish) you should widen your river calling ranges significantly, and be prepared to call them down with less than ideal holdings.  Don’t wait around for a monster hand, because these don’t come along as often, and try to take their stack before the next guy.  Lastly, if an otherwise weak and timid player starts making huge bets, your top pair hand probably isn’t good enough anymore.  Look for completed draws and assume they have it. Make a disciplined laydown and live to fight another day.  One bonus tip, be sure to practice hand history review off the felt. Filter for the hands that went to showdown, and try to narrow your opponent’s range street by street.  Talk to yourself out loud and tell yourself all the information you have. This will sharpen your decision-making skills in-game, and you’ll be able to accurately assess your opponent’s ranges in no time.  You’ll be able to read souls, make all kinds of huge laydowns and hero calls like a pro. Just remember, practice makes perfect. .
คาสิโน โบนัส 100% คาสิโน โบนัส100% เฮงๆ 666 คาสิโน หวยออนไลน์ คาสิโน
1 2 3 185